Why Markets Expect a Fed Rate Hike in December, and What Could Stop It

Payrolls beat consensus by 100,000 and markets now price roughly an 80% chance of a Fed rate hike in December, even though the Fed just held at 3.75%-4.00%.
By John Zadeh -
Diesel price sign at $6.29 and 80% odds beneath a red dusk sky with the Fed building behind, fed rate hike december
  • October payrolls rose 165,000 against a 65,000 consensus, with unemployment at 4.1%, lifting market-implied odds of a December Fed hike to about 80% from about 67%.
  • The Fed held rates at 3.75%-4.00% on 28 October by a 10-2 vote, with Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack dissenting for a hike, and Chair Kevin Warsh offered no forward guidance.
  • Inflation is supply-driven: producer energy prices rose 10.8% in September and accounted for more than 80% of the increase in goods prices, so a hike cannot fix the source.
  • Democratic control of both chambers lowers the risk of large deficit-funded spending but raises the risk of debt-limit fights and shutdown threats, with Warsh facing tougher oversight.
  • Because a hike is largely priced in, a December hold would be the bigger surprise, and PCE inflation is not expected back at target until at least 2028.
Summarise with AI:

The October jobs report beat expectations by 100,000 positions. Payrolls rose 165,000 against a 65,000 consensus, and unemployment slipped to 4.1%. Yet nine days earlier, on 28 October 2026, the Federal Reserve chose to hold rates steady, and markets still price roughly an 80% chance of a Fed rate hike in December. The obvious question is why a Fed that just declined to act leaves traders so convinced it will act next time.

The answer sits in a crowded week. The Fed’s September minutes landed on 3 November, Democrats took both chambers of Congress the next day, and the jobs data arrived yesterday, 6 November. Each thread pulls on the others.

Together they set the terms for the December meeting under Chair Kevin Warsh, and for the policy fight that follows it into 2028.

This analysis separates what markets have already priced from what remains open. It also shows how politics, energy-driven inflation and monetary policy interact, and where that interaction touches your portfolio.

Why markets expect a December hike, and why it is not a promise

The case for a hike

The federal funds rate is the overnight lending rate the Fed uses to steer borrowing costs, and its target range sits at 3.75%-4.00% after a September increase. The September minutes showed every participant backed that move.

The jobs data has since strengthened the hawks. September payrolls were revised up to 60,000 from 29,000, and October’s beat followed. At the October meeting, the vote to hold was 10-2, with Governors Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack dissenting in favour of a quarter-point hike.

When inflation and employment both drift from target, the Fed’s dual mandate forces a choice about which gap to close first, and with prices running well above 2% the weight currently falls on price stability, which helps explain why dissent skews hawkish.

Warsh himself said inflation had been above the Fed’s objective for close to six years. CME FedWatch, a tool that converts futures prices into meeting probabilities, showed hike odds at about 67% before the October inflation report and about 80% on 6 November.

Hub chart of December hike probability: 80% chance driven by 165,000 payrolls, 4.1% unemployment, and 100 of 100 economists expecting a hike.

October payrolls of 165,000 and unanimous economist consensus contribute to an 80% market probability of a December rate hike.

Why the Fed could still wait

The Fed has promised nothing. The October statement said more information would guide the appropriate stance, and Warsh declined to offer forward guidance, which is the Fed’s practice of signalling future moves in advance. Morningstar reported that the press conference set no clear December bias.

The voices around the decision agree on the problem but differ on the pace.

Voice Stated view Timing stance
Reuters poll (16-20 October) All 100 economists expected a December hike December
Lorie Logan, Dallas Fed “At least” two more quarter-point hikes needed Multiple moves ahead
Christopher Hodge, Natixis Another hike “warranted” on sticky inflation Near term
Chris Whalen, Whalen Global Advisors Probably one quarter-point hike, not enough to truly slow growth December
Alex Pelle, Mizuho Hold was information-gathering; financial conditions already tighter Flexible
Kevin Warsh, Fed Chair Inflation above objective for close to six years No commitment

The September revision is itself a warning about how volatile hiring data can be, and pre-release suggestions of cooling wage growth remain unconfirmed. A hold, or eventually a cut if growth weakens, stays possible.

What an 80% probability tells you is that a hike is the base case, not a certainty. Because it is already largely priced in, the bigger market surprise may be a December hold.

Where the inflation is coming from: energy, diesel and food

Follow the inflation back to its source and you find oil. September’s consumer price index (CPI), the government’s main measure of household prices, rose 0.60% for the month on the headline measure and 0.3% on core, which strips out food and energy.

The pressure moves through the economy in five steps:

  1. Household energy: gasoline, heating and electricity bills.
  2. Transport: diesel for trucking, rail, construction and delivery.
  3. Agriculture: diesel, fertiliser, chemicals and machinery.
  4. Food distribution: freight costs passed through wholesalers, retailers and restaurants.
  5. Expectations: visible price rises feeding into wage and price setting.

The numbers at each stage are steep:

  • US Energy Information Administration (EIA) September averages: gasoline $4.35/gal, diesel $6.29/gal
  • Distillate inventories expected below the 2021-2025 average, with diesel easing toward about $4.50/gal on average in 2027
  • Intermediate food inputs up 15.6% year on year; wholesale food up 1.2%
  • Corn, hay, hayseeds and oilseeds each up more than 25% year on year

Producer energy prices rose 10.8% in September, accounting for more than 80% of the increase in goods prices.

Oil sits above $100 with the Iran conflict unresolved, and Reuters reported on 6 November that extreme weather and shipping disruptions are adding to food costs. That makes this inflation supply-driven rather than wage-driven.

US oil dominance changes who absorbs the shock: with domestic output far above Saudi Arabia’s, higher prices recirculate income through producers and pension funds, though lower-income households still bear a regressive fuel burden.

Flow diagram of energy-driven inflation: producer energy prices rose 10.8% in September, driving ></a>80% of goods prices increase across 5 steps.”></p>
<p><em>Producer energy prices rose 10.8% in September, driving over 80% of goods prices increase through a 5-step cascading effect.</em></p>
<p>Here lies the Fed’s bind. A rate hike cools demand, but it cannot drill more oil, refine more diesel or produce more fertiliser. Tightening too far risks damaging employment while leaving the source untouched, which is why the Reuters poll sees PCE inflation (the Fed’s preferred price gauge) running more than a point above <strong>2%</strong> and not returning to target until at least <strong>2028</strong>.</p>
<p>For you, the practical read is that fuel and grocery bills may stay high even after a hike. Policy and the cost of living can move in opposite directions.</p>
<h2>What divided government changes for the Fed and fiscal policy</h2>
<p>Gridlock is often read as calm for markets. This time, it cuts both ways.</p>
<h3>Fiscal policy under gridlock</h3>
<p>Before the election, Republicans held the House <strong>218-214</strong> with two vacancies and the Senate <strong>53-47</strong>. Reuters reported on <strong>4 November</strong> that Democrats captured both chambers, with its graphics showing about <strong>250</strong> Democrats to <strong>160</strong> Republicans in the House count and Senate flips in South Carolina, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio, Kansas and Iowa.</p>
<p>The fiscal consequences split into two camps:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Lower risk:</strong> large, fast spending packages become harder to pass, reducing the odds of a deficit-funded demand surge</li>
<li><strong>Higher risk:</strong> debt-limit fights, appropriations deadlines, shutdown threats and delayed tax legislation</li>
</ul>
<p>Whalen expects little legislative progress, more hearings, and affordability holding as a top-three issue into <strong>2028</strong>. He attributes Republican losses partly to aggressive immigration enforcement and the unpopular Iran war.</p>
<h3>A freer Fed, under a spotlight</h3>
<p>Warsh was confirmed <strong>51-45</strong> to a 14-year term beginning <strong>1 February 2026</strong>, and became chair on <strong>22 May 2026</strong>. Democratic control changes the politics around him.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Reuters reported that Democratic Senate control strengthens the confirmation “guardrail” against further Trump-aligned appointments and hands Democrats control of Fed oversight committees.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That cuts both ways too. Elizabeth Warren, the likely Senate Banking chair, is a harsh Warsh critic, and Reuters framed the result as “new headaches” for the chair.</p>
<p>The sources diverge on some details. Whalen expects possible Fed governor vacancies to go unfilled and argues Trump could retain a veto-proof margin if Republicans stay united, while the current board record shows no vacant seat and Reuters reports Democratic control of both chambers. Whalen’s views read best as forward-looking expectations rather than current fact.</p>
<p>History offers some perspective: Paul Volcker’s Fed tightened hard from <strong>1979-81</strong> despite intense political pressure. For you, gridlock means fewer fiscal surprises but more deadline-driven volatility, and oversight headlines are a risk to watch rather than a factor likely to change the December decision.</p>
<h2>How a December hike could play out across portfolios and into 2028</h2>
<h3>What a hike does to yields</h3>
<p>Short-term Treasury yields track the Fed closely, so a quarter-point hike pushes them up almost directly. Long-term yields respond to growth, inflation and deficit expectations, so they may rise less, which flattens the yield curve (the gap between short and long rates).</p>
<p>Whether a quarter-point move tightens conditions in practice depends on <a href=real yields, since a hike that fails to outpace inflation expectations may do little to firm the dollar or cool borrowing.

Gridlock complicates the long end. Less stimulus can pull expected growth and long yields lower, while deficits, the Iran war and sticky inflation can keep the term premium high, which is the extra return investors demand for holding longer bonds.

Reuters reported markets weighing inflation against growth fears, with energy and food costs raising stagflation concerns (high inflation alongside slowing growth) and feeding a technology selloff. The sector tendencies below are general patterns, not forecasts.

Sector Likely effect of hike Why
Long-duration tech and growth Pressure Future earnings are worth less at higher rates
Real estate Pressure Higher borrowing costs and rate sensitivity
Small caps and leveraged firms Pressure Refinancing needs become more expensive
Banks Relative support Curve shape and net interest margin
Energy Relative support Elevated oil and diesel prices
Healthcare and staples Relative support Defensive, steadier demand
Utilities Pressure Compete with higher bond yields

The 2028 affordability squeeze

A hike lets Warsh argue he is protecting purchasing power. It also lands on households through mortgages, credit cards and business loans.

If growth slows, Democrats could call policy too tight. If prices persist, both parties own the problem, and Whalen argues Democrats now share responsibility for affordability.

Check how much of your portfolio is rate-sensitive or energy-exposed. A single modest hike matters less than a long stretch of high prices with no relief, and with PCE not expected at target until at least 2028, the real test arrives then, not in December.

The signals that will settle the December question

A December hike is the probable outcome, not a guaranteed one. Markets have priced about 80% odds, the data leans hawkish, and the Fed has kept its options open.

Politics shapes how much room Warsh has to act and how loudly he is questioned, more than which direction he moves. The inflation itself is coming from oil, diesel and food, which a rate hike can only partly address.

Four signals will narrow the question before the meeting:

  • The October CPI release, forecast at +0.24% headline and +0.2% core (Morningstar, 6 November)
  • The next jobs report, and whether hiring strength holds after recent revisions
  • Energy and diesel prices, with the Iran conflict as the swing factor
  • Warsh’s public communication ahead of the meeting

If those signals soften, the bigger surprise becomes a hold. If they stay firm, the hike that markets already expect is likely to matter less than how long elevated prices persist.

Investors exploring how one soft print can shift rate expectations will find our detailed coverage of June’s core CPI miss shows how quickly pricing can swing.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Financial projections are subject to market conditions and various risk factors.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the federal funds rate?

The federal funds rate is the overnight lending rate the Fed uses to steer borrowing costs across the economy. Its target range currently sits at 3.75%-4.00% after a September increase.

What are the odds of a Fed rate hike in December?

CME FedWatch put the probability of a December hike at about 80% on 6 November, up from about 67% before the October inflation report. That makes a hike the base case, not a certainty, and a hold would be the bigger market surprise.

Why is the Fed considering a hike when it just held rates steady in October?

The October hold was a 10-2 vote, with Governors Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack dissenting in favour of a quarter-point hike. Stronger jobs data, with payrolls of 165,000 against a 65,000 consensus, and inflation well above 2% have since strengthened the hawkish case.

Will a Fed rate hike lower fuel and grocery prices?

Probably not quickly. The current inflation is supply-driven, with oil above $100, diesel at $6.29/gal and intermediate food inputs up 15.6%, and a rate hike cools demand but cannot produce more oil, diesel or fertiliser.

How could a December rate hike affect my portfolio?

Long-duration tech, real estate, small caps and utilities tend to face pressure from higher rates, while banks, energy, healthcare and staples tend to see relative support. These are general patterns, not forecasts, so the first step is checking how much of your portfolio is rate-sensitive or energy-exposed.

John Zadeh
By John Zadeh
Founder & CEO
John Zadeh is an investor and media entrepreneur with over a decade in financial markets. As Founder and CEO of StockWire X and Discovery Alert, Australia's largest mining news site, he's built an independent financial publishing group serving investors across the globe.
Learn More

Breaking ASX Alerts Direct to Your Inbox

Join +20,000 subscribers receiving alerts.

Join thousands of investors who rely on StockWire X for timely, accurate market intelligence.

About the Publisher