Mayne Pharma Beats Cosette Again as Court Blocks Bid to Walk Away From Deal

The Mayne Pharma Cosette Court Appeal ended in a clean sweep for Mayne on 14 October 2026, with every Cosette argument rejected, costs awarded, and a High Court deadline of 11 November now ticking.
By Josua Ferreira -
  • The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed Cosette's appeal on all grounds on 14 October 2026 and awarded Mayne Pharma its costs of the appeal.
  • The Court confirmed no Mayne Material Adverse Change occurred and that Mayne did not mislead on its FY25 EBITDA performance.
  • Cosette elected to affirm the scheme implementation deed through its conduct at the first hearing, forgoing any alleged right to terminate.
  • Cosette's roughly $14.4 million cost payment from June 2026 is unaffected, while the amount of the appeal costs is still to be determined.
  • Cosette has until 11 November 2026 to consider seeking special leave to appeal to the High Court, and Mayne will keep pursuing damages with no figure disclosed.
Summarise with AI:

Court of Appeal dismisses Cosette’s appeal on all grounds

On 14 October 2026, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal brought by Cosette on all grounds and awarded Mayne Pharma Group Limited (ASX: MYX) its costs of the appeal. The Cosette Court of Appeal judgment relates to the proposed transaction between Mayne Pharma and Cosette.

The appeal was the subject of a notice filed with the court, referred to in Mayne Pharma’s 15 January 2026 announcement. It challenged the decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales delivered on 15 October 2025. Cosette is ultimately owned by Hamilton Lane and Avista Capital.

Timeline of the Mayne Pharma vs. Cosette Legal Dispute

The Court of Appeal affirmed the findings made by Justice Black. For shareholders, this removes a layer of legal uncertainty around the first instance outcome.

Professor Bruce Robinson, Mayne Pharma Board Chair

“We are delighted that the Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Supreme Court at first instance and rejected Cosette’s attempts to assert it had any right to terminate the deal…”

What the Court rejected

Material Adverse Change and misleading conduct claims

Cosette’s appeal sought to overturn parts of the first instance decision. These included the decision that no Mayne Material Adverse Change had occurred, and that Mayne Pharma did not engage in misleading and deceptive conduct regarding its FY25 EBITDA financial performance.

The Court of Appeal rejected every argument advanced by Cosette in support of its appeal.

Cosette elected to affirm the deal

The Court also held that, by Cosette’s conduct at the first Court hearing in connection with the proposed Scheme, Cosette elected to affirm the scheme implementation deed. In doing so, it forewent any alleged right to terminate.

The key findings can be summarised as follows:

  1. No Mayne Material Adverse Change had occurred.
  2. Mayne Pharma did not engage in misleading and deceptive conduct regarding its FY25 EBITDA financial performance.
  3. Cosette elected to affirm the scheme implementation deed.

Understanding the legal terms behind the ruling

A Material Adverse Change clause is a term in a deal agreement that can allow a party to walk away if a serious negative event affects the other party. A scheme implementation deed is the agreement setting out how a proposed Scheme between two parties is to proceed.

“Special leave to appeal” is permission from the High Court to bring an appeal. It is not automatic.

The findings matter because Cosette’s alleged right to terminate depended on these issues. The Court of Appeal’s conclusions that no Mayne Material Adverse Change occurred and that Cosette affirmed the deed are relevant to Mayne Pharma’s position in the ongoing dispute.

Costs recovered and what comes next

As disclosed on 22 May 2026, Cosette paid approximately $14.4 million to Mayne Pharma in connection with its costs of the proceeding below. The appeal decision has no effect on that payment. Costs of the appeal have been awarded to Mayne Pharma but remain to be determined.

Cosette paid approximately $14.4 million on 5 June 2026 under a Supreme Court of NSW cost order, a sum covering legal costs, the costs of the costs application and interest.

Cosette has until 11 November 2026 to consider whether it will seek special leave to appeal the decision to the High Court.

Item Status Detail
Costs of first proceeding Paid Approximately $14.4 million
Costs of appeal Awarded To be determined
High Court special leave window Open Until 11 November 2026

Mayne Pharma will continue to pursue its claims for damages, on behalf of itself and Mayne Pharma shareholders, against:

  • Cosette
  • Cosette Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc
  • Its controllers, Mr David Burghstahler and Avista Capital

The announcement does not disclose a damages amount.

Professor Robinson said Mayne Pharma “remains committed to continuing to maximise shareholder value and remains focussed on continuing to strengthen the business…”

Mayne Pharma is an ASX-listed specialty pharmaceutical company that is a leader in dermatology and women’s health in the United States. It also provides contract development and manufacturing services to clients worldwide.

Don’t Miss the Next Healthcare Breakthrough

Get FREE breaking ASX healthcare news in your inbox within minutes of release, complete with in-depth analysis and the full announcement. Join 20,000+ investors who stay ahead of the market. Click the “Free Alerts” button at Big News Blast to receive alerts the moment market-moving news breaks.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Material Adverse Change clause?

A Material Adverse Change clause is a term in a deal agreement that can allow a party to walk away if a serious negative event affects the other party. The Court found no Mayne Material Adverse Change had occurred.

What did the Mayne Pharma Cosette Court Appeal decide?

On 14 October 2026 the NSW Court of Appeal dismissed Cosette's appeal on all grounds and awarded Mayne Pharma its costs of the appeal. It affirmed Justice Black's earlier findings.

Can Cosette appeal to the High Court?

Cosette has until 11 November 2026 to consider seeking special leave to appeal to the High Court. Special leave is permission from the High Court to bring an appeal and is not automatic.

How much has Cosette paid Mayne Pharma in legal costs?

Cosette paid approximately $14.4 million on 5 June 2026 under a Supreme Court of NSW cost order, covering legal costs, the costs application and interest. Costs of the appeal are awarded but yet to be determined.

What is a scheme implementation deed?

A scheme implementation deed is the agreement setting out how a proposed Scheme between two parties is to proceed. The Court held that Cosette elected to affirm this deed through its conduct.

Josua Ferreira
By Josua Ferreira
Partnership Director
Josua Ferreira holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Marketing and Advertising and brings a background in publication, business development, and ASX market storytelling. He has worked with listed companies across the resource sector and broader market, combining sharp commercial instincts with a genuine commitment to keeping investors informed.
Learn More
Companies Mentioned in Article

Breaking ASX Alerts Direct to Your Inbox

Join +20,000 subscribers receiving alerts.

Join thousands of investors who rely on StockWire X for timely, accurate market intelligence.

About the Publisher