BPH Energy Loses Court Battle Over Major Gas Permit as Appeal Decision Looms

By Josua Ferreira -

Federal Court dismisses PEP11 judicial review as BPH Energy weighs appeal options

BPH Energy has advised that the Federal Court of Australia dismissed the judicial review application brought by Asset Energy and Bounty Oil & Gas concerning the PEP11 offshore petroleum permit on 17 June 2026. The decision by Justice Jackson means the Commonwealth–New South Wales Offshore Petroleum Joint Authority’s refusal of the joint venture’s extension, variation, and suspension applications now stands. BPH holds a 35.8% interest in Advent Energy, which owns Asset Energy, the operator of the PEP11 joint venture.

Asset Energy holds 85% of PEP11, with Bounty Oil & Gas holding the remaining 15%. The company is reviewing the judgment with advisers and, together with joint venture participants, considering all available options including an appeal. Advent intends to engage Senior Counsel to advise on appeal prospects.

What the Federal Court found — and what it means for PEP11

Justice Jackson’s judgment delivered three key findings in Federal Court proceedings WAD36/2025. The Court dismissed the application for judicial review, meaning the Joint Authority’s January 2025 refusal decision remains in effect. Asset Energy was found to have been denied procedural fairness relating to undisclosed well costings used by the regulator. However, the Court ruled this procedural fairness breach was not material because the public interest ground independently justified the refusal.

The judgment also addressed how the Joint Authority used statements made in the NSW Parliament. The Court held that the regulator was able to rely on what was said in Parliament as reflecting community views, but Parliamentary privilege prevented any challenge to the truth of those statements.

Court Finding Implication for PEP11
Application for judicial review dismissed Refusal decision stands
Procedural fairness denied on well costings Acknowledged but ruled not material
Parliamentary statements relied upon Cannot challenge truth of statements

The Court acknowledged a procedural fairness issue existed but determined it was not determinative. The “public interest” ground independently supported the refusal, which may limit the legal traction available on appeal. The order suspending the Joint Authority’s refusal decision will be vacated from 5pm AWST on 1 July 2026, with cost submissions due by mid-July.

The Federal Court hearing on PEP 11 concluded in February 2026 with Justice Jackson reserving the decision, leaving BPH Energy shareholders in an extended waiting period before the June ruling resolved the question of whether the Joint Authority’s refusal would stand.

What is PEP11 and why does it matter for east coast gas supply?

PEP11 is an offshore petroleum exploration permit located in the lower Hunter Region of New South Wales, covering approximately 4,649 square kilometres less than 50km from the Newcastle metropolitan area. An offshore exploration permit allows companies to explore for oil and gas in designated areas. If commercial discoveries are made, the permit holder can progress to production activities, subject to further approvals.

The PEP11 joint venture considers the permit to be highly prospective for natural gas. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), and other agencies have identified a forecast east coast gas supply shortfall. The joint venture positions PEP11 as a potentially significant contributor to addressing this supply gap.

Asset Energy operates the permit with an 85% interest, while Bounty Oil & Gas holds 15%. BPH Energy’s exposure to PEP11 is indirect, through its 35.8% interest in Advent Energy, which owns Asset Energy.

PEP11 Joint Venture Ownership Structure

The permit’s strategic value is tied to Australia’s projected gas shortfall. If the permit can be advanced — whether through appeal or renewal — it represents potential exposure to a supply-constrained domestic gas market.

Separate renewal application remains before NOPTA

A separate pathway remains open despite the Federal Court dismissal. In March 2025, Advent lodged a renewal application with the National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator (NOPTA) covering 50% of the existing PEP11 permit area. This renewal application is distinct from the Federal Court proceedings and remains under consideration by NOPTA.

Importantly, the PEP11 permit remains in force pending NOPTA’s consideration and determination of the renewal application. The permit has not lapsed. Advent has stated it will continue to address the renewal application further with NOPTA.

Renewal Application Detail Status
Lodged March 2025
Coverage 50% of existing PEP11 area
Current status Pending NOPTA consideration
Permit status Remains in force pending determination

The renewal pathway offers a potential route forward even if the appeal on the original refusal is unsuccessful. Investors should monitor both tracks — the potential appeal of the Federal Court decision and the separate NOPTA renewal process.

What happens next for BPH Energy shareholders

BPH and joint venture participants are considering all options including an appeal of Justice Jackson’s decision. Advent intends to engage Senior Counsel to advise on appeal prospects. The company has stated it will keep the market informed of material developments, including any decision on an appeal or further action by the PEP11 joint venture, in accordance with continuous disclosure obligations.

BPH’s trading halt has been lifted following the announcement. The Court’s order suspending the Joint Authority’s refusal decision will be vacated from 5pm AWST on 1 July 2026.

Key upcoming dates and milestones:

  1. Suspension of refusal decision vacated: 1 July 2026 (5pm AWST)
  2. Cost submissions due: 1 July 2026
  3. Responsive cost submissions due: 15 July 2026
  4. Appeal decision: To be advised

The next several weeks will be critical for clarity on whether an appeal proceeds. Separately, investors should track the timeline for NOPTA’s consideration of the renewal application lodged in March 2025.

Announcement Authorisation

David Breeze (Director) authorised the release of this announcement to the market.

Don’t Miss the Next Energy Play Before the Market Moves

Join 20,000+ investors receiving FREE breaking ASX news and in-depth analysis delivered within minutes of release. Click the “Free Alerts” button at Big News Blast to get real-time coverage of Energy, Tech, Healthcare, and every non-resource sector the moment news breaks.


Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Federal Court decide about PEP11?

On 17 June 2026, Justice Jackson dismissed the judicial review application brought by Asset Energy and Bounty Oil & Gas, meaning the Joint Authority's January 2025 refusal of PEP11's extension, variation, and suspension applications remains in effect.

What is PEP11 and why is it significant?

PEP11 is an offshore petroleum exploration permit covering approximately 4,649 square kilometres less than 50km from Newcastle, NSW, which the joint venture considers highly prospective for natural gas and a potential contributor to Australia's forecast east coast gas supply shortfall.

Can BPH Energy still appeal the Federal Court decision on PEP11?

Yes — BPH Energy and joint venture participants are considering all available options including an appeal, and Advent intends to engage Senior Counsel to advise on appeal prospects following the June 2026 ruling.

What is the NOPTA renewal application and how does it differ from the Federal Court case?

In March 2025, Advent lodged a separate renewal application with the National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator covering 50% of the existing PEP11 area; this process is entirely distinct from the Federal Court proceedings and the permit remains in force pending NOPTA's determination.

What are the key upcoming dates for BPH Energy shareholders following the PEP11 ruling?

The Court's order suspending the refusal decision will be vacated at 5pm AWST on 1 July 2026, cost submissions are due that same date, responsive cost submissions are due 15 July 2026, and any appeal decision timeline is yet to be confirmed.

Josua Ferreira
By Josua Ferreira
Partnership Director
Josua Ferreira holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Marketing and Advertising and brings a background in publication, business development, and ASX market storytelling. He has worked with listed companies across the resource sector and broader market, combining sharp commercial instincts with a genuine commitment to keeping investors informed.
Learn More
Companies Mentioned in Article

Breaking ASX Alerts Direct to Your Inbox

Join +20,000 subscribers receiving alerts.

Join thousands of investors who rely on StockWire X for timely, accurate market intelligence.

About the Publisher