Judo Capital Holdings Ltd Posts 34% PBT Lift as Scale Ambitions Near

Judo Bank's FY26 full year result delivered a 34% lift in pre-tax profit to $168.1m and the highest NIM of any listed ADI, but a 56% blowout in the cost of risk to $117.7m kept ROE at 6.4% — well short of the low-to-mid teens target management is still chasing.
By Josua Ferreira -
  • Judo Bank reported FY26 profit before tax of $168.1m, up 34%, with income rising 24% to $522.4m and profit before impairment jumping 42% to $285.8m.
  • The cost of risk surged 56% to $117.7m — or 0.88% of average GLA — driven by three individually assessed exposures and sector-specific stress in real estate, hospitality, and retail, nearly double the bank's 50bps through-the-cycle target.
  • NIM improved 20 basis points to 3.13%, described as the highest of any listed ADI in Australia, with second-half NIM reaching 3.23% on favourable deposit pricing.
  • The gross loan book hit $14.7bn, putting Judo at the doorstep of its $15bn–$20bn at-scale target, with management confirming no additional equity issuance is planned to get there.
  • FY27 guidance of $210–$220m PBT implies 25–31% growth, with ROE targeted at circa 8% as the bank continues its path toward a low-to-mid teens return on equity at scale.
Summarise with AI:

Judo delivers 34% lift in pre-tax profit as scale ambitions near reality

In its FY26 full year results presentation dated 18 August 2026, Judo Capital Holdings reported profit before tax (PBT) of $168.1m, up 34%, and net profit after tax (NPAT) of $111.1m, up 29% on the prior year.

Income rose 24% to $522.4m, while profit before impairment jumped 42% to $285.8m. The one blemish sat squarely in the cost of risk, which climbed to $117.7m, up 56%, a provision increase CEO Chris Bayliss described as disappointing.

Management reiterated the strategic anchor underpinning the result: a target of a sustainable return on equity (ROE) in the low-to-mid teens at scale.

FY26 result headlines at a glance

The table below sets out the key financial and operating metrics disclosed in the FY26 result.

Metric FY26 FY25 Change
Income $522.4m $422.9m +24%
Profit before impairment $285.8m $201.1m +42%
Profit before tax $168.1m $125.6m +34%
NPAT $111.1m $86.4m +29%
GLA $14,672m $12,465m +18%
Deposits $12.2bn $9.9bn +24%
NIM 3.13% 2.93% +20bps
CTI 45.3% 52.4% −710bps
ROE 6.4% 5.3% +110bps
EPS 9.9c 7.7c +29%

In his reflections on the year, Bayliss noted that aside from cost of risk, FY26 was a year of strong underlying performance.

Chris Bayliss, Chief Executive Officer & Managing Director

Bayliss reflected that aside from the disappointing provision increase, FY26 was a year of strong underlying performance. He noted Judo remains highly confident in its business model, underpinned by a clear competitive advantage, and continues to focus on executing its strategy to deliver a sustainable ROE in the low-to-mid teens.

What makes Judo different: the SME lending model explained

Judo is a challenger bank that exists to serve small and medium enterprise (SME) customers who do not fit the systemised, one-size-fits-all credit assessment processes used by incumbent banks.

The trade-off is straightforward. Judo charges higher margins for premium service: faster decisions, smarter judgement and stronger relationships. The model is designed to generate above-system returns provided credit risk stays within expected bounds.

Two ratios help explain how this plays out. Net interest margin (NIM) measures the gap between what the bank earns on lending and what it pays for funding. A high NIM of 3.13%, described as the highest of listed authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), reflects Judo’s premium positioning.

The cost-to-income ratio (CTI) measures operating expenses as a share of income. A falling CTI, down to 45.3% from 52.4%, indicates improving operating leverage as the bank scales.

Judo’s portfolio settings are set consistent with an at-scale cost of risk (COR) of 50bps, its expected through-the-cycle write-offs. This is based on a portfolio probability of default (PD) of 2.08% and cumulative loss given default (LGD) of 27%.

Management framed continued ROE improvement around four levers:

  • Growth
  • Margins
  • Operating leverage
  • Risk management and capital

Underlying momentum: lending, deposits and margins

Gross loans and advances (GLA) grew 18% to $14.7bn, described as approximately 2.8x system growth, with Judo noted as Australia’s fastest-growing business lender over five years.

Deposits grew 24% to $12.2bn, now representing 71% of total funding. FY26 saw the launch of two new at-call savings products, intermediated savings accounts in October 2025 and direct online savings accounts in February 2026, expanding the addressable deposit market beyond term deposits.

NIM improved 20bps to 3.13%, with a second-half NIM of 3.23% driven by favourable deposit pricing. Customer and staff engagement metrics also strengthened, with an industry-leading Lending Net Promoter Score (NPS) of +58 (up from +53) and JEDI employee engagement of 74.

Funding diversification continued through the wholesale market:

  • $150m Tier 2 issue completed in October 2025, with a 120bps pricing improvement versus the prior issuance
  • $750m capital-relief securitisation completed in June 2026, contributing 60bps to the CET1 ratio

The $750m capital-relief securitisation completed in June 2026 was upsized from an initial $500m target on strong domestic and international demand, with notes pricing at a weighted average of 171bps over BBSW, a 102bps improvement on Judo’s inaugural 2023 transaction.

The impairment story: honest look at asset quality

The cost of risk rose to $117.7m, or 0.88% of average GLA, from $75.5m, driven by higher individually assessed provisions and an increase in the collective provision.

The three individually assessed exposures driving the provision increase were first flagged in Judo’s FY26 asset quality update in late June, which identified the deterioration following a Q3 customer review and confirmed that 90-days-past-due loans were tracking toward approximately 3% of gross loans at year end.

The share of 90+ days past due (DPD) and impaired assets rose to 2.90% of GLA, up from 2.43%, with pressure concentrated in specific sectors including rental, hiring and real estate services, accommodation and food services, and retail trade.

There were offsetting positives. The 30–89 DPD ratio fell to 0.39% of GLA from 1.04%, resolution activity remained strong, and provision coverage remained prudent at 1.47% of GLA. Management stated relevant exposures have been reviewed with learnings incorporated.

On portfolio strength, 86% of credit exposure is fully or partially secured, and 94% of customer groups sit below $10m. The numbers point to cyclical, sector-specific pressure within an otherwise diversified book rather than a structural change to the model.

Capital strength and the path to scale

CET1 stood at 12.4% at 30 June 2026, above management’s operating range of 11.0–12.0%, with Total Capital of 16.2%.

Management stated it has no plans to issue additional core equity to achieve its target at-scale loan book, and flagged potential capital management initiatives in due course.

The presentation set out the following metrics-at-scale targets:

  • GLA: $15bn – $20bn
  • NIM: >3%
  • CTI: approaching 30%
  • COR: 50bps of GLA
  • ROE: low-to-mid teens

Management said Judo is now nearing scale, with focus increasingly shifting toward optimising returns.

Judo FY26 Actuals vs. At-Scale Targets

FY27 guidance and outlook

The company provided the following FY27 guidance.

Metric FY27 guidance
PBT $210–$220m (~25–31% growth)
ROE Circa 8% (assuming 31% effective tax rate)
GLA Disciplined above-system growth
NIM Broadly stable vs FY26
CTI Continued improvement
COR Broadly consistent with FY26

Management framed FY27 as continued PBT momentum and progress toward the low-to-mid-teens ROE ambition. Stated priorities include scaling warehouse lending, deepening broker partnerships through the Broker Black Belt program, AI-led productivity with around 230 use cases identified, and enhanced early-warning risk indicators. Management said Judo remains firmly on track to deliver sustained ROE expansion.

Stay Ahead on ASX Finance and Fintech News

Breaking ASX financial sector news lands in your inbox within minutes of release, with in-depth analysis already done. Join 20,000+ investors who rely on Big News Blast for FREE real-time alerts the moment market-moving announcements hit. Click the “Free Alerts” button to start receiving coverage across finance, fintech, and beyond before the broader market catches on.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is Judo Bank's net interest margin and why does it matter?

Judo Bank's net interest margin (NIM) was 3.13% in FY26, the highest of any listed authorised deposit-taking institution in Australia. NIM measures the gap between what the bank earns on loans and what it pays for deposits — a higher NIM reflects Judo's premium pricing for its relationship-based SME lending model.

What caused Judo Bank's cost of risk to spike in FY26?

Judo's cost of risk rose 56% to $117.7m, driven by higher individually assessed provisions on three specific exposures and an increase in the collective provision. The stress was concentrated in sectors including rental and real estate services, accommodation and food, and retail trade, and was first flagged in a June 2026 asset quality update.

What is Judo Bank's profit before tax guidance for FY27?

Judo Bank guided FY27 profit before tax of $210–$220m, representing growth of approximately 25–31% on the FY26 result of $168.1m, with ROE expected to reach circa 8% and NIM broadly stable versus FY26.

How close is Judo Bank to reaching its at-scale loan book target?

Judo's gross loans and advances reached $14.7bn at 30 June 2026, sitting at the lower end of its $15bn–$20bn at-scale target range. Management stated the bank is now nearing scale and confirmed it has no plans to issue additional core equity to reach that target.

What is Judo Bank's return on equity target and when does management expect to achieve it?

Judo is targeting a sustainable return on equity in the low-to-mid teens at scale, compared to 6.4% in FY26 and a guided circa 8% in FY27. Management has not set a specific year for achieving the target, framing it as a function of continued loan book growth, margin stability, operating leverage, and normalising credit costs.

Josua Ferreira
By Josua Ferreira
Partnership Director
Josua Ferreira holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Marketing and Advertising and brings a background in publication, business development, and ASX market storytelling. He has worked with listed companies across the resource sector and broader market, combining sharp commercial instincts with a genuine commitment to keeping investors informed.
Learn More
Companies Mentioned in Article

Breaking ASX Alerts Direct to Your Inbox

Join +20,000 subscribers receiving alerts.

Join thousands of investors who rely on StockWire X for timely, accurate market intelligence.

About the Publisher